15% off membership for Easter! Learn more. Close

You are the PM at Facebook Post. What reactions should we add next?

Asked at Meta (Facebook)
1.9k views
Answers (1)
crownAccess expert answers by becoming a member

You'll get access to over 3,000 product manager interview questions and answers

badge Gold PM

Interesting. Okay, so I'm the PM for Post, and my goal is to identify which reactions I should add next. Just to make sure we're on the same page about reactions, I see it as a lightweight way to help users express themselves. This helps FB users in a few ways. First, it enables users who would not spend time writing a lightweight comment to express themselves on a post. Second, it makes it easier for users who were already thinking about writing a lightweight comment to express themselves faster. Finally, there is another component of reactions that is related to displaying aggregate reactions on a post, that is super useful to analyze the overall sentiment behind reactions to the post. Does this cover the full feature? Cool!

I'd also say that reactions seems super aligned with FB's goal of providing tools to build community and bring people closer together. I see the goal for the reactions feature as helping people express themselves through a lightweight tool to interact with posts. Does this make sense? Next, I'd like to cover how I would measure success of the feature. This will help answer the question of which reactions to add next.

Ok, I can think of a few metrics to achieve this goal. One type of metrics would be related to usage of the feature:

  • Penetration metrics such as "# of Weekly Active Users"
    • Specifically, I'm thinking about the number of users who used at least a reaction during a period of a week.
    • And a week, because:
      • Daily would be too limiting in that some users only use FB some days of the week, and there might be specific patterns not representing the full user base on a given week.
      • Monthly would be interesting, but would require us to way too long to get results.
      • Weekly seems like a good middle ground.
    • We can also normalize it by dividing it by the total FB user base just to make sure the metric is relative to the whole population.
  • Rate of usage metrics such as "# Weekly Reactions per User"
    • This will provide additional visibility into the level of engagement of users with the feature.
  • Counter metrics related to:
    • Cannibalization of other Posts features such as "# of Weekly Active Users of the Comments feature" given that interactions with comments might decrease given that lightweight comments will most likely be cannibalized.
    • Potential negaticve impact on Facebook overall such as "# of Weekly Active Users of Facebook"
    • Integrity metrics. On this topic, I'd like to focus on unacceptable sentiments on the platform. I would work with DS on this, but the goal is to make sure FB remains a healthy sentiment platform. One example would be "# of hate posts / comments".
After we deploy the test I assume data will show Reactions going up, but Comments going down. In that case I would prioritize the total number of interactions with a Post. If the increase in Reactions is compensates for the decrease in Comments, I would say it helps accomplish our goal of "helping people express themselves through a lightweight tool to interact with posts". And I would consider it successful if all other metrics are at parity.
 
Now that we chatted about how we would beasure success, my next step would be to identify which reactions will enable us to achieve success. I would connect with psychologists and DS to identify the major categories of reactions across the world. Psychologists are a great source of information for sentiment and there are probably a ton of frameworks out there. Data Sciences can also help by identifying the number of existing posts from FB that show evidence of each of those sentiments.
 
Based on this analysis I would quantify sentiments and tackle them by frequency of usage - in decreasing order. Naturally, we have a UI constraint in the number of reactions we can add to a mobile device, and we also don't want to make it too overwhelming to consume.
 
Then I would work with Design to come up with the best visual representation of that - one that would work across the world in varied culture settings. Finally I would test it in qualitative user research even before we got to Engineering development to make sure the design of the reaction is effective with users.
 
This would be my approach, did I miss anything?
Access expert answers by becoming a member
0 likes   |  
1 Feedback
badge Platinum PM

Hey Pedro, I would have followed the format of a product design question to answer this question. Here is how I would think about it: 

  • What are the user groups that express their emotions? 
  • What emotions does a user group for a scenario will have? 
  • What reaction icons (solutions) will solve for those emotions? 

hope it helps. 

4
Get unlimited access for $12/month
Get access to 2,346 pm interview questions and answers to give yourself a strong edge against other candidates that are interviewing for the same position
Get access to over 238 hours of video material containing an interview prep course, recorded mock interviews by expert PMs, group practice sessions, and QAs with expert PMs
Boost your confidence in PM interviews by attending peer to peer mock interview practices, group practices, and QA sessions with expert PMs
Get unlimited access for $12/month
Get access to 2,346 pm interview questions and answers to give yourself a strong edge against other candidates that are interviewing for the same position
Get access to over 238 hours of video material containing an interview prep course, recorded mock interviews by expert PMs, group practice sessions, and QAs with expert PMs
Boost your confidence in PM interviews by attending peer to peer mock interview practices, group practices, and QA sessions with expert PMs